Tom Butt
 
  E-Mail Forum – 2018  
  < RETURN  
  Richmond Gets Second Bond Rating Boost in a Year
November 28, 2018
 

Just before Thanksgiving, Lori Trevino from Moody’s informed us that the City of Richmond’s bond issuer rating had been upgraded to Baa3 from Ba1 and Pension Obligation Bond (POB) rating to Ba1 from Ba2 with a stable outlook.

Note that according to Moody’s rating system:

  • Obligations rated Baa are judged to be medium-grade and subject to moderate credit risk and as such may possess certain speculative characteristics.
  • Obligations rated Ba are judged to be speculative and are subject to substantial credit risk.

In sum, the rating is still lower than we think the City deserves but at least the rating is out of (speculative) junk bond land and back in the investment grade territory.

We actually got a substantially better boost from S&P a year ago (Richmond Bond Rating Gets a Boost, December 9, 2017), when  S&P Global Ratings raised the City of Richmond’s issuer credit rating (ICR) to “A-“ from “BBB+”. 

The S& P rating is A-, which is 4 notches better than the Moody’s rating after the upgrade. There are several major refundings that can occur next near (Civic Center, RDA and the Port, totaling over $200 million, and strength in the ratings can mean better interest rates (each 1/10th of a percent in interest rate savings means $200,000/year in savings).

See Moody’s Press Release below:

Rating Action:
Moody's upgrades Richmond, CA issuer rating to Baa3 from Ba1 and POB rating to Ba1 from Ba2; assigns stable outlook
21 Nov 2018
https://www.moodys.com/_layouts/Mdc/Images/AjaxLoadingCircle.gif
New York, November 21, 2018 -- Moody's Investors Service has upgraded the city of Richmond, CA's issuer rating to Baa3 from Ba1 and pension obligation bond (POB) rating to Ba1 from Ba2. The city has $311.8 million in debt outstanding, of which $6.5 million is Moody's-rated POBs. The outlook is stable.

RATINGS RATIONALE
The upgrades reflect the healthy growth in the city's tax base and economy, demonstrated by recovery and increases in assessed valuation (AV), jobs and new development. The upgrade further reflects material improvement in the city's financial position resulting from increasing revenues from ongoing and new sources and modest expenditures cuts.
The Baa3 issuer rating reflect the city's sizable tax base, which has recovered from recessionary declines and has new developments underway. The taxable assessed valuation (AV) reached $15.2 billion in fiscal 2019 to eclipse its pre-recession high in fiscal 2010. The tax base has elevated taxpayer concentration, given its largest single taxpayer is Chevron refinery, which comprises 26.9% of total AV. The rating also reflects resident wealth measures that are slightly below average, though the local economy is improving as employment and housing markets have strengthened. The Baa3 incorporates the city's narrow reserves and liquidity, which however have improved since their low point in fiscal 2014. The city has a history of reliance on one-time revenues and operating with a structural deficit, which management has moved to close through voter-approved, ongoing tax increases and modest cost cutting. The rating further incorporates a high level of net direct debt, with a complex structure, escalating debt service and high overlapping debt. Pension and OPEB liabilities are elevated and will pose ongoing budget pressures, consistent with other California cities.
The Ba1 POB rating benefits from the city's pension override tax, which can only be used for pension costs and POB debt service. As a result, we have narrowed the notching between the city's issuer rating and POB rating from two to one, varying from our standard rating notching for a California city POB.

RATING OUTLOOK
The stable outlook reflects our view the city will maintain its current financial position. Management's ability to eliminate reliance on one-time revenues, reduce accumulated deficit balances outside the general fund, and meet its recently increased reserve target will be key to future reviews of the city's credit profile.

FACTORS THAT COULD LEAD TO AN UPGRADE
- Dedication of expected one-time revenues to building reserves
- Improvement of available reserves and cash levels
- Proactive cost-cutting and revenue-raising measures to address increasing fixed costs
- Increase in available pension override property tax revenues for pension costs and POBs

FACTORS THAT COULD LEAD TO A DOWNGRADE
- Decline of assessed valuation
- Deficit spending

LEGAL SECURITY
The city's issuer rating is equivalent to what would be its general obligation (GO) bond rating. In California, GO bonds are secured by a dedicated, voter-approved property tax, which is restricted for use to GO bond debt service and therefore largely insulated from any operational challenges of the municipality. GO bond security is also enhanced by a statutory lien.
The city's POBs are an unconditional legal obligation of the city, payable from all available financial resources, including the city's pension override tax revenues.

PROFILE
Richmond encompasses 34 square miles on the western shore of Contra Costa County (Aa2 stable), with 32 miles of shoreline on San Francisco Bay. Richmond is a charter city, providing a full range of municipal services to its approximately 117,000 residents. It operates a housing authority, sewer system, storm water system, deep water port, and marina as enterprises.

METHODOLOGY
The principal methodology used in the issuer rating was US Local Government General Obligation Debt published in December 2016. The principal methodology used in the pension obligation bond rating was Lease, Appropriation, Moral Obligation and Comparable Debt of US State and Local Governments published in July 2018. Please see the Rating Methodologies page on www.moodys.com for a copy of these methodologies.

REGULATORY DISCLOSURES
For ratings issued on a program, series or category/class of debt, this announcement provides certain regulatory disclosures in relation to each rating of a subsequently issued bond or note of the same series or category/class of debt or pursuant to a program for which the ratings are derived exclusively from existing ratings in accordance with Moody's rating practices. For ratings issued on a support provider, this announcement provides certain regulatory disclosures in relation to the credit rating action on the support provider and in relation to each particular credit rating action for securities that derive their credit ratings from the support provider's credit rating. For provisional ratings, this announcement provides certain regulatory disclosures in relation to the provisional rating assigned, and in relation to a definitive rating that may be assigned subsequent to the final issuance of the debt, in each case where the transaction structure and terms have not changed prior to the assignment of the definitive rating in a manner that would have affected the rating. For further information please see the ratings tab on the issuer/entity page for the respective issuer on www.moodys.com.
Regulatory disclosures contained in this press release apply to the credit rating and, if applicable, the related rating outlook or rating review.
Please see www.moodys.com for any updates on changes to the lead rating analyst and to the Moody's legal entity that has issued the rating.
Please see the ratings tab on the issuer/entity page on www.moodys.com for additional regulatory disclosures for each credit rating.

Lori Trevino
Lead Analyst
Regional PFG West
Moody's Investors Service, Inc.
One Front Street
Suite 1900
San Francisco 94111

US
JOURNALISTS: 1 212 553 0376
Client Service: 1 212 553 1653
Gera McGuire
Additional Contact
Regional PFG Dallas

JOURNALISTS: 1 212 553 0376
Client Service: 1 212 553 1653
Releasing Office:
Moody's Investors Service, Inc.
250 Greenwich Street
New York, NY 10007
U.S.A
JOURNALISTS: 1 212 553 0376
Client Service: 1 212 553 1653

  < RETURN