Tom Butt
 
  E-Mail Forum – 2014  
  < RETURN  
  Who Will Be the Next Mayor of Richmond?
October 23, 2014
 
 

http://kalw.org/post/who-will-be-next-mayor-richmond
This story required some comments and corrections.
·         The author states: “Unfortunately, at this debate and other mayoral debates, all three candidates spoke in generalities and political platitudes. There was lack of depth in responses, and moderators failed to push back to elicit more concrete examples of how each candidate will strengthen Richmond. This frustrated many attendees and will be a difficult task for Richmond voters to overcome as they make their choice.” This conclusion appears to be based on a criticism by Mark Wassberg, a notorious City Council gadfly with no credibility. The fact is that these forums typically allow a minute or two to respond, which allows for nothing more than a sound bite. To get details about my campaign, including experience and plans for the future, see www.tombutt.com.
·         Speaking of Uwahemu, the author states, “Specifically, he wants to bring a tech incubator to Richmond and provide computer skills for Richmond’s youth.” Richmond actually already has a tech incubator. From San Francisco Business Times: “The new venture, called TopLine, began operations quietly on June 1, but Young says three companies have already moved in and he expects to have a full complement of young firms in the invitation-only accelerator within three to six months. Candidates for TopLine are “companies that have hit or are about to hit that inflection point to really accelerate revenue growth,” said Young, who calls the space the biggest incubator co-working space in the East Bay.” Read about it in http://www.bizjournals.com/sanfrancisco/blog/real-estate/2014/07/topline-allan-young-lawrence-berkeley-lab-richmond.html?page=all. Regarding employment, Richmond has added 5,100 jobs since 2010, reducing unemployment by half from 18.5% to 9.5%.
·         Bates is quoted, “To accomplish this, Bates intends to attract businesses by becoming an easier and faster place to get a permit. Bates call this a “one-stop-shop”. In fact, Richmond already runs a one-stop permit shop. It is located on the second floor of City Hall.
·         I am quoted, “Most noticeably, he says, is successfully drawing an extension of the Lawrence Berkeley Lab.” I don’t know what this means. I am not “drawing” an extension of the Lawrence Berkeley Lab.
The photo below, strangely enough, was taken before the start of a forum at Hilltop. Both Nat and I are looking at our smartphones, which makes us look inattentive, but we are not.
Who will be the next mayor of Richmond?
By Todd Whitney

  • http://mediad.publicbroadcasting.net/p/kalw/files/styles/medium/public/201410/Richmond_Mayors.png

Richmond mayoral candidates
Richmond Confidential
Listen
Listening...
5:18
Richmond is a city of contrasts. While the city hosts one of the largest oil companies in the world, Chevron, it also holds the title as America’s largest city controlled by the Green Party. Since 2006, Mayor Gayle McLaughlin’s Richmond Progressive Alliance has pushed for the highest minimum wage in California and created an ambitious plan to rescue underwater mortgages.
The balance of power could change soon. On November 4th, Richmonders will elect a new mayor and direction for the city.
In late September, Richmond’s three mayoral candidates met for a debate sponsored by the League of Women Voters. There was an overflow crowd to see Tom Butt, Nat Bates, and Uche Uwahemu. The three-candidate field is small compared with the 15 people running to be mayor of Oakland, but the small field doesn’t properly reflect the enormity of the upcoming election.
Uche Uwahemu
Jordan Mason is one of many Richmonders volunteering for Uwahemu’s campaign. Mason says he supports Uche, because he likes his beliefs and the way he supports local communities. Jordan is only 16 and isn’t old enough to vote for Uwahemu just yet, but some of his peers can. One reason Richmond youth are turning out to support Uwahemu is due to his youth-centered platform that revolves around employing Richmond’s young adults. Specifically, he wants to bring a tech incubator to Richmond and provide computer skills for Richmond’s youth. It’s a platform Uwahemu is stressing to distinguish himself from more familiar and politically established opponents.
Nat Bates
Nat Bates has been involved in Richmond politics since 1967, and he says he’s qualified to cut Richmond’s 9.9% unemployment rate. To accomplish this, Bates intends to attract businesses by becoming an easier and faster place to get a permit. Bates call this a “one-stop-shop”.
“You have to create a business friendly climate, of which this city does not have,” he says.
One of the businesses Bates wants to create a friendlier climate for is Chevron. The company is the city’s largest employer and has contributed almost $3 million to Richmond’s local election.
Tom Butt
Tom Butt has worked in Richmond’s City Hall for nearly 20 years. He’s been endorsed by current Mayor Gayle McLaughlin’s Richmond Progressive Alliance. Some are hoping Butt will continue the RPA’s progressive streak, but he’s avoided that rhetoric throughout his campaign. Butt is an architect and has centered his campaign on infrastructure, public safety, and quality of life issues. It’s what he calls “nuts and bolts”.
“In Richmond, what we focused on, and I think what is most important, is improving the quality of life in Richmond. And that includes public safety. If we do that, businesses want to come here. Particularly small businesses,” says Butt.
As a current member of Richmond’s city council, Butt is running on recent successes in Richmond. Most noticeably, he says, is successfully drawing an extension of the Lawrence Berkeley Lab.
“Richmond is not a city that needs to be fixed. We have a lot of problems that need to be addressed. But let me tell you, we’re making huge improvements in the quality of life in Richmond. We just need to keep going,” says Butt.
The lack of a defining debate
Unfortunately, at this debate and other mayoral debates, all three candidates spoke in generalities and political platitudes. There was lack of depth in responses, and moderators failed to push back to elicit more concrete examples of how each candidate will strengthen Richmond. This frustrated many attendees and will be a difficult task for Richmond voters to overcome as they make their choice. But one thing is definite: in this city of contrasts, the next mayor will eventually have to answer the tough questions.

 

Want to receive TOM BUTT E-FORUM and other action alerts on Richmond political and community issues delivered to your email address? Email your name and email address and/or the names and email addresses of others who would like to be placed on the mailing list and the message "subscribe" to tom.butt@intres.com. Comments, arguments and corrections are welcome.  Tom Butt is a member of the Richmond City Council   when opinions and views expressed, without other attribution, in TOM BUTT E-FORUM, they are those of Tom Butt and do not reflect official views or positions of the City of Richmond or the Richmond City Council unless otherwise noted. Visit the Tom Butt website for additional information about Tom Butt's activities on the Richmond City Council: http://www.tombutt.com.  Phone 510/236-7435 or 510/237-2084. Subscription to this service is at the personal discretion of the recipient and may be terminated by responding with “unsubscribe.” It may take a few days to remove addresses from the distribution list.

This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

To the extent that content is excerpted under the fair use doctrine from other media, I urge readers to subscribe to the print versions of these media with print versions to help support professional journalism and the businesses that publish news, and I urge readers to log in to the online versions to access additional content, related content and unrelated news as well as the advertisements that support the media. I especially appreciate local sources of news that include the Contra Costa Times , the San Francisco Chronicle, Richmond Confidential and the East Bay Express.


 

 
  < RETURN